Wrong Potter book and the Real Spoilers!

It seems my source wasn't authentic enough hence the earlier misleading spoilers...

here go the real spoilers:

Also have a look at why the 'leaker' is safe!

Read more...

Why the 'leaker' of Harry's last adventure is safe - the escape route!

As claimed here, "A few lines of 'digital DNA' could allow the publishers of Harry Potter to find and finger the person apparently responsible for leaking the final adventures of the boy wizard...", may not turn out to be entirely fool-proof.

Taken, the digital DNA (EXIF data) has revealed the camera model [Canon Rebel 350] and the serial number [560151117] and may eventually point out the owner of the camera, but is he/she the person they are really looking for? Noticeable is the fact that the camera has been out for 3 years - and assuming that the 'original owner' would still be the 'owner' of the camera is a bit far-fetched and even if true, provides an escape-route for the 'leaker'.

Read the full story...

Simply put, these cases are possible:
Case 1: Original Owner is the Current Owner.
Escape Route #1. Destroy the piece. Say that somebody stole it.
Escape Route #2. Trashed it on 'World Garbage Day' [that weird day when people throw out their old tech items]!

Case 2: Original Owner is NOT the Current Owner.
Escape Route #3. The Original Owner reveals the identity of the Current Owner who in turn employs escape route 1 & 2.
Escape Route #4. The Original Owner and the Current Owner get into a deal, and the Original Owner employs escape route 1 & 2.

Another Case: Original Owner is NOT the Current Owner but IS questioned.
This is where I have my doubts. Is the person responsible for the clicked pics since he is the owner of the camera even if he didn't click them, as is the case in 'Fire-arms'? What does the law (of different countries) have to say about this? What if he clicked them for personal use but claims 'he didn't upload them'? Is he still responsible? If yes, what would happen in a case if in a fight between two, one of them uses a third person's, say 'camera', to hit the other on his head and the latter dies - is the third person an accomplice in murder?

Time to rethink, i guess!

Read more...

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows spoilers!

Spoilers!

- Ron dies
- Lupin dies
- Percy dies
- Voldemort dies
- Snape dies
- Harry DOES NOT!

Read the full story...

Details not needed -> Just say BELLATRIX KILLS RON!

Snape's loyalty?
The reader found this to be the saddest part of the book. As many people guessed, all was not what it seemed with Dumbledore, and the two did indeed have a plan that would eventually result in Snape killing him. But, Snape was only in on things for personal gain, and when Voldemort learns of this, he is obviously furious with Snape. Snape tries to make up for things by luring Harry to him, but Harry manages to escape, and Voldemort kills Snape before the final conflict.

The reader doesn't know what all these rumours are about Voldemort kidnapping Ron, it's a complete lie. Ron is killed by Bellatrix Lestrange in The Battle of Hogwarts, but Neville manages to finish off Bellatrix after Ron weakens her before his death.

Harry is not a horcrux.

Voldemort is killed in the Department Of Mysteries. He baits Harry about his parents, Sirius, Dumbledore and Ron. which turns out to be the worst thing Voldemort could have done. As Voldemort steps out into the circular bit with many doors, Harry opens the locked door, and Voldemort is destroyed by the blinding light, which heals Harry, who seems close to death (he does not die!).

Update: July 21, 2007 - The REAL Spoilers!

Checkout the 'A-Z' list of Harry Potter World!

Read more...